fix: restore all removed bundled skills + fix skills sync system

- Restored 21 skills removed in commits 757d012 and 740dd92:
  accelerate, audiocraft, code-review, faiss, flash-attention, gguf,
  grpo-rl-training, guidance, llava, nemo-curator, obliteratus, peft,
  pytorch-fsdp, pytorch-lightning, simpo, slime, stable-diffusion,
  tensorrt-llm, torchtitan, trl-fine-tuning, whisper

- Rewrote sync_skills() with proper update semantics:
  * New skills (not in manifest): copied to user dir
  * Existing skills (in manifest + on disk): updated via hash comparison
  * User-deleted skills (in manifest, not on disk): respected, not re-added
  * Stale manifest entries (removed from bundled): cleaned from manifest

- Added sync_skills() to CLI startup (cmd_chat) and gateway startup
  (start_gateway) — previously only ran during 'hermes update'

- Updated cmd_update output to show new/updated/cleaned counts

- Rewrote tests: 20 tests covering manifest CRUD, dir hashing, fresh
  install, user deletion respect, update detection, stale cleanup, and
  name collision handling

75 bundled skills total. 2002 tests pass.
This commit is contained in:
teknium1 2026-03-06 15:57:12 -08:00
parent 68fbae5692
commit ab0f4126cf
74 changed files with 27881 additions and 44 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
# Performance Benchmarks
## Contents
- Speed comparisons across GPUs
- Memory usage analysis
- Scaling with sequence length
- Training vs inference performance
- Flash Attention versions comparison
## Speed comparisons across GPUs
### A100 80GB (Ampere)
**Forward pass time** (milliseconds, batch=8, heads=32, dim=64):
| Seq Length | Standard | Flash Attn 2 | Flash Attn 3 | Speedup (FA2) |
|------------|----------|--------------|--------------|---------------|
| 512 | 1.2 | 0.9 | N/A | 1.3x |
| 1024 | 3.8 | 1.4 | N/A | 2.7x |
| 2048 | 14.2 | 4.8 | N/A | 3.0x |
| 4096 | 55.1 | 17.3 | N/A | 3.2x |
| 8192 | 218.5 | 66.2 | N/A | 3.3x |
### H100 80GB (Hopper)
**Forward pass time** (milliseconds, same config):
| Seq Length | Standard | Flash Attn 2 | Flash Attn 3 (FP16) | Flash Attn 3 (FP8) | Best Speedup |
|------------|----------|--------------|---------------------|--------------------|--------------|
| 512 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 2.7x |
| 1024 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 6.5x |
| 2048 | 9.8 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 7.5x |
| 4096 | 38.2 | 12.5 | 7.2 | 4.8 | 8.0x |
| 8192 | 151.4 | 47.8 | 27.1 | 18.2 | 8.3x |
**Key insight**: Flash Attention 3 on H100 with FP8 achieves ~1.2 PFLOPS (75% of theoretical max).
### A10G 24GB (Ampere)
**Forward pass time** (milliseconds, batch=4):
| Seq Length | Standard | Flash Attn 2 | Speedup |
|------------|----------|--------------|---------|
| 512 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.3x |
| 1024 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 2.4x |
| 2048 | 25.9 | 9.4 | 2.8x |
| 4096 | 102.1 | 35.2 | 2.9x |
## Memory usage analysis
### GPU memory consumption (batch=8, heads=32, dim=64)
**Standard attention memory**:
| Seq Length | Attention Matrix | KV Cache | Total | Notes |
|------------|------------------|----------|-------|-------|
| 512 | 8 MB | 32 MB | 40 MB | Manageable |
| 2048 | 128 MB | 128 MB | 256 MB | Growing |
| 8192 | 2048 MB (2 GB) | 512 MB | 2.5 GB | Large |
| 32768 | 32768 MB (32 GB) | 2048 MB | 34 GB | OOM on 24GB GPUs |
**Flash Attention 2 memory**:
| Seq Length | Attention (on-chip) | KV Cache | Total | Reduction |
|------------|---------------------|----------|-------|-----------|
| 512 | 0 MB (recomputed) | 32 MB | 32 MB | 20% |
| 2048 | 0 MB | 128 MB | 128 MB | 50% |
| 8192 | 0 MB | 512 MB | 512 MB | 80% |
| 32768 | 0 MB | 2048 MB | 2 GB | 94% |
**Key insight**: Flash Attention doesn't materialize attention matrix, saving O(N²) memory.
### Memory scaling comparison
**Llama 2 7B model memory** (float16, batch=1):
| Context Length | Standard Attention | Flash Attention 2 | Can Fit 24GB GPU? |
|----------------|-------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
| 2K | 3.2 GB | 2.1 GB | Both: Yes |
| 4K | 5.8 GB | 2.8 GB | Both: Yes |
| 8K | 12.1 GB | 4.2 GB | Both: Yes |
| 16K | 26.3 GB (OOM) | 7.8 GB | Only Flash: Yes |
| 32K | OOM | 14.2 GB | Only Flash: Yes |
### Training memory (Llama 2 7B, batch=4)
| Context | Standard (GB) | Flash Attn (GB) | Reduction |
|---------|---------------|-----------------|-----------|
| 2K | 18.2 | 12.4 | 32% |
| 4K | 34.8 | 16.8 | 52% |
| 8K | OOM (>40GB) | 26.2 | Fits! |
## Scaling with sequence length
### Computational complexity
**Standard attention**:
- Time: O(N² × d)
- Memory: O(N² + N × d)
**Flash Attention**:
- Time: O(N² × d) (same, but with better constants)
- Memory: O(N × d) (linear!)
### Empirical scaling (A100, batch=1, heads=32, dim=64)
**Time per token (milliseconds)**:
| Sequence | 512 | 1K | 2K | 4K | 8K | 16K |
|----------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|------|
| Standard | 0.15 | 0.37 | 1.11 | 3.44 | 13.4 | 52.8 |
| Flash Attn 2 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.83 | 1.64 |
| Speedup | 1.4x | 2.6x | 4.6x | 8.0x | 16.1x | 32.2x |
**Observation**: Speedup increases quadratically with sequence length!
### Memory per token (MB)
| Sequence | 512 | 1K | 2K | 4K | 8K | 16K |
|----------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|------|
| Standard | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.64 | 2.05 | 8.13 |
| Flash Attn 2 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
**Observation**: Flash Attention memory per token is constant!
## Training vs inference performance
### Training (forward + backward, Llama 2 7B, A100)
| Batch × Seq | Standard (samples/sec) | Flash Attn (samples/sec) | Speedup |
|-------------|------------------------|--------------------------|---------|
| 4 × 2K | 1.2 | 3.1 | 2.6x |
| 8 × 2K | 2.1 | 5.8 | 2.8x |
| 4 × 4K | 0.4 | 1.3 | 3.3x |
| 8 × 4K | OOM | 2.4 | Enabled |
| 2 × 8K | 0.1 | 0.4 | 4.0x |
### Inference (generation, Llama 2 7B, A100)
| Context Length | Standard (tokens/sec) | Flash Attn (tokens/sec) | Speedup |
|----------------|----------------------|-------------------------|---------|
| 512 | 48 | 52 | 1.1x |
| 2K | 42 | 62 | 1.5x |
| 4K | 31 | 58 | 1.9x |
| 8K | 18 | 51 | 2.8x |
| 16K | OOM | 42 | Enabled |
**Note**: Inference speedup less dramatic than training because generation is memory-bound (KV cache accesses).
## Flash Attention versions comparison
### Flash Attention 1 vs 2 vs 3 (H100, seq=4096, batch=8)
| Metric | FA1 | FA2 | FA3 (FP16) | FA3 (FP8) |
|--------|-----|-----|------------|-----------|
| Forward time (ms) | 28.4 | 12.5 | 7.2 | 4.8 |
| Memory (GB) | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 2.8 |
| TFLOPS | 180 | 420 | 740 | 1150 |
| GPU util % | 35% | 55% | 75% | 82% |
**Key improvements**:
- FA2: 2.3x faster than FA1 (better parallelism)
- FA3 (FP16): 1.7x faster than FA2 (H100 async optimizations)
- FA3 (FP8): 2.6x faster than FA2 (low precision)
### Features by version
| Feature | FA1 | FA2 | FA3 |
|---------|-----|-----|-----|
| Basic attention | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Causal masking | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multi-query attention | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Sliding window | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Paged KV cache | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| FP8 support | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ (H100 only) |
| Work partitioning | Basic | Advanced | Optimal |
## Real-world model benchmarks
### Llama 2 models (A100 80GB, batch=4, seq=2048)
| Model | Params | Standard (samples/sec) | Flash Attn (samples/sec) | Speedup |
|-------|--------|------------------------|--------------------------|---------|
| Llama 2 7B | 7B | 1.2 | 3.1 | 2.6x |
| Llama 2 13B | 13B | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2.8x |
| Llama 2 70B | 70B | 0.12 | 0.34 | 2.8x |
### GPT-style models (seq=1024)
| Model | Standard (tokens/sec) | Flash Attn (tokens/sec) | Speedup |
|-------|----------------------|-------------------------|---------|
| GPT-2 (124M) | 520 | 680 | 1.3x |
| GPT-J (6B) | 42 | 98 | 2.3x |
| GPT-NeoX (20B) | 8 | 22 | 2.75x |
## Recommendations by use case
**Training large models (>7B parameters)**:
- Use Flash Attention 2 on A100
- Use Flash Attention 3 FP8 on H100 for maximum speed
- Expected: 2.5-3x speedup
**Long context inference (>4K tokens)**:
- Flash Attention essential (enables contexts standard attention can't handle)
- Expected: 2-4x speedup, 5-10x memory reduction
**Short sequences (<512 tokens)**:
- Flash Attention provides 1.2-1.5x speedup
- Minimal memory benefit
- Still worth enabling (no downside)
**Multi-user serving**:
- Flash Attention reduces per-request memory
- Allows higher concurrent batch sizes
- Can serve 2-3x more users on same hardware

View file

@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
# HuggingFace Transformers Integration
## Contents
- Enabling Flash Attention in Transformers
- Supported model architectures
- Configuration examples
- Performance comparisons
- Troubleshooting model-specific issues
## Enabling Flash Attention in Transformers
HuggingFace Transformers (v4.36+) supports Flash Attention 2 natively.
**Simple enable for any supported model**:
```python
from transformers import AutoModel
model = AutoModel.from_pretrained(
"meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
device_map="auto"
)
```
**Install requirements**:
```bash
pip install transformers>=4.36
pip install flash-attn --no-build-isolation
```
## Supported model architectures
As of Transformers 4.40:
**Fully supported**:
- Llama / Llama 2 / Llama 3
- Mistral / Mixtral
- Falcon
- GPT-NeoX
- Phi / Phi-2 / Phi-3
- Qwen / Qwen2
- Gemma
- Starcoder2
- GPT-J
- OPT
- BLOOM
**Partially supported** (encoder-decoder):
- BART
- T5 / Flan-T5
- Whisper
**Check support**:
```python
from transformers import AutoConfig
config = AutoConfig.from_pretrained("model-name")
print(config._attn_implementation_internal)
# 'flash_attention_2' if supported
```
## Configuration examples
### Llama 2 with Flash Attention
```python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
import torch
model_id = "meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_id,
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
device_map="auto"
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
# Generate
inputs = tokenizer("Once upon a time", return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_length=100)
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0]))
```
### Mistral with Flash Attention for long context
```python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM
import torch
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1",
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, # Better for long context
device_map="auto",
max_position_embeddings=32768 # Extended context
)
# Process long document (32K tokens)
long_text = "..." * 10000
inputs = tokenizer(long_text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=False).to("cuda")
outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512)
```
### Fine-tuning with Flash Attention
```python
from transformers import Trainer, TrainingArguments
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.float16
)
training_args = TrainingArguments(
output_dir="./results",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
num_train_epochs=3,
fp16=True, # Must match model dtype
optim="adamw_torch_fused" # Fast optimizer
)
trainer = Trainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=train_dataset
)
trainer.train()
```
### Multi-GPU training
```python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM
import torch
# Model parallelism with Flash Attention
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"meta-llama/Llama-2-13b-hf",
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
device_map="auto", # Automatic multi-GPU placement
max_memory={0: "20GB", 1: "20GB"} # Limit per GPU
)
```
## Performance comparisons
### Memory usage (Llama 2 7B, batch=1)
| Sequence Length | Standard Attention | Flash Attention 2 | Reduction |
|-----------------|-------------------|-------------------|-----------|
| 512 | 1.2 GB | 0.9 GB | 25% |
| 2048 | 3.8 GB | 1.4 GB | 63% |
| 8192 | 14.2 GB | 3.2 GB | 77% |
| 32768 | OOM (>24GB) | 10.8 GB | Fits! |
### Speed (tokens/sec, A100 80GB)
| Model | Standard | Flash Attn 2 | Speedup |
|-------|----------|--------------|---------|
| Llama 2 7B (seq=2048) | 42 | 118 | 2.8x |
| Llama 2 13B (seq=4096) | 18 | 52 | 2.9x |
| Llama 2 70B (seq=2048) | 4 | 11 | 2.75x |
### Training throughput (samples/sec)
| Model | Batch Size | Standard | Flash Attn 2 | Speedup |
|-------|------------|----------|--------------|---------|
| Llama 2 7B | 4 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 2.6x |
| Llama 2 7B | 8 | 2.1 | 5.8 | 2.8x |
| Llama 2 13B | 2 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2.8x |
## Troubleshooting model-specific issues
### Issue: Model doesn't support Flash Attention
Check support list above. If not supported, use PyTorch SDPA as fallback:
```python
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"model-name",
attn_implementation="sdpa", # PyTorch native (still faster)
torch_dtype=torch.float16
)
```
### Issue: CUDA out of memory during loading
Reduce memory footprint:
```python
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"model-name",
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
device_map="auto",
max_memory={0: "18GB"}, # Reserve memory for KV cache
low_cpu_mem_usage=True
)
```
### Issue: Slower inference than expected
Ensure dtype matches:
```python
# Model and inputs must both be float16/bfloat16
model = model.to(torch.float16)
inputs = tokenizer(..., return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
inputs = {k: v.to(torch.float16) if v.dtype == torch.float32 else v
for k, v in inputs.items()}
```
### Issue: Different outputs vs standard attention
Flash Attention is numerically equivalent but uses different computation order. Small differences (<1e-3) are normal:
```python
# Compare outputs
model_standard = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("model-name", torch_dtype=torch.float16)
model_flash = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"model-name",
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.float16
)
inputs = tokenizer("Test", return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
with torch.no_grad():
out_standard = model_standard(**inputs).logits
out_flash = model_flash(**inputs).logits
diff = (out_standard - out_flash).abs().max()
print(f"Max diff: {diff:.6f}") # Should be ~1e-3 to 1e-4
```
### Issue: ImportError during model loading
Install flash-attn:
```bash
pip install flash-attn --no-build-isolation
```
Or disable Flash Attention:
```python
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"model-name",
attn_implementation="eager", # Standard PyTorch
torch_dtype=torch.float16
)
```
## Best practices
1. **Always use float16/bfloat16** with Flash Attention (not float32)
2. **Set device_map="auto"** for automatic memory management
3. **Use bfloat16 for long context** (better numerical stability)
4. **Enable gradient checkpointing** for training large models
5. **Monitor memory** with `torch.cuda.max_memory_allocated()`
**Example with all best practices**:
```python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, TrainingArguments
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, # Better for training
device_map="auto",
low_cpu_mem_usage=True
)
# Enable gradient checkpointing for memory
model.gradient_checkpointing_enable()
# Training with optimizations
training_args = TrainingArguments(
output_dir="./results",
per_device_train_batch_size=8,
gradient_accumulation_steps=2,
bf16=True, # Match model dtype
optim="adamw_torch_fused",
gradient_checkpointing=True
)
```