wip: 05-mvp-deployment paused at task 0/0

This commit is contained in:
Mikhail Putilovskij 2026-04-30 18:04:24 +03:00
parent 7e5f9c20a0
commit 6369721876
2 changed files with 93 additions and 42 deletions

View file

@ -3,37 +3,60 @@ phase: 05-mvp-deployment
phase_name: MVP deployment
task: 0
total_tasks: 0
status: completed
last_updated: 2026-04-28T21:07:17Z
status: paused
last_updated: 2026-04-30T15:03:14Z
---
<current_state>
Phase 05 deployment handoff is complete. Image rebuilt for linux/amd64 and handoff text prepared for platform team.
Phase 05 code changes are in place, but the latest workspace-root attachment contract is not yet published in a new production image. Today's last debugging step confirmed that the user-to-agent config itself was fine except for one exact-MXID mismatch: the homeserver suffix in `user_agents` did not match the real Matrix sender, so fallback to the first agent was expected.
</current_state>
<completed_work>
- Rebuilt image for linux/amd64 (was arm64 only): `mput1/surfaces-bot:latest`
- Updated deploy handoff digest in .continue-here.md
- Prepared deployment checklist text for platform
- Fixed the path-based `base_url` normalization bug that caused WS connects to drop route prefixes.
- Added WS lifecycle debug logging behind `SURFACES_DEBUG_WS=1`.
- Added Matrix routing/recovery behavior:
- warning users when they are not listed in `user_agents`
- preserving room bindings across config updates
- re-inviting users back into their Space and active rooms after leave
- `!new` from the entry/DM room to create a fresh working chat
- Reworked attachment handling so user files now go directly into the agent workspace root with Windows-style collision suffixes like `file (1).pdf`.
- Updated docs and tests to match the new root-workspace file contract.
- Verified that the recent “still goes to default agent” report was caused by exact MXID mismatch in config, not by YAML parsing or runtime routing logic.
- Published earlier images:
- `mput1/surfaces-bot:debug-ws-20260429`
- `mput1/surfaces-bot:matrix-recovery-20260429`
</completed_work>
<remaining_work>
- Platform needs to pull image and deploy
- Awaiting smoke test confirmation from platform side
- Build and publish a new production image that includes the latest workspace-root attachment changes.
- Give the platform the new digest and ask them to redeploy the Matrix bot container.
- Optionally run local smoke/fullstack validation once more before publishing if extra confidence is needed.
</remaining_work>
<decisions_made>
- Rebuild for amd64 to match platform's production environment
- Keep the fallback to the first agent when a user is missing from `user_agents`.
- Require exact Matrix MXID match in `user_agents`; no fuzzy matching or homeserver normalization was added.
- Warn the user in-band when default-agent fallback is used.
- Keep room identity and `platform_chat_id` stable across config updates.
- Require container restart for config changes; no image rebuild is needed for `matrix-agents.yaml` edits alone.
- Remove `incoming/` and timestamp prefixes from the attachment contract.
- Save uploaded user files directly at the workspace root and resolve collisions with copy-style suffixes.
</decisions_made>
<blockers>
- None — implementation complete, awaiting platform deployment
- No code blocker.
- External dependency: platform redeploy after the next image publish.
- Historical debt: placeholder summary/plan artifacts still exist in old Phase 04 files and were not cleaned during this session.
</blockers>
<context>
The current codebase should route correctly if the deployed config uses the exact real Matrix sender IDs, e.g. `@user:matrix.lambda.coredump.ru`. The next likely mistake during resume would be publishing the wrong image digest: the currently published recovery image predates the latest file-contract change. Resume by building a fresh image from the current worktree, not by reusing the old digest.
</context>
<next_action>
Await platform deployment confirmation. No further implementation work needed until platform reports issues or requests changes.
</next_action>
Rebuild the production image from the current worktree, publish it, and send the new digest to the platform for redeploy.
</next_action>